KEY TO THE FAMILIES OF HARPACTICOIDA
(amended from Lang, 1948)
|
1. |
Commensal on whales. |
Balaenophilidae a) |
|
|
Not commensal on whales. |
2 |
|
2. |
Body laterally compressed, as Fig. 4. |
|
|
|
Body dorso-ventrally compressed, with the expanded epimera of the anterior abdominal segments enfolding the posterior abdomen and caudal furca, giving the body the shape of a wood-louse. (Figs. 5-6). |
3 |
|
|
Body of a
different shape from either of above conditions. |
4 |
|
3. |
Body-shape as Fig. 5; without clearly seen chitin “skeleton”; P.1 as Fig. 22. |
Porcellidiidae a) |
|
|
Body-shape as Fig. 6; a chitinous “skeleton” clearly visible; P .1 as Fig. 23. |
|
|
4. |
Exp. A.2 of at least 6 segments. |
5 |
|
|
Exp. A.2 of not more than 4 segments. |
6 |
|
5. |
Distal segment of Enp. P.2 much longer than the entire Exp. |
Longipediidae a) |
|
|
Distal segment of Enp. P.2 shorter than the Exp. |
|
|
6. |
Segment bearing the P.1 not fused to the cph.; Exp. A.2 of 1 segment with several setae; Mxp. lamelliform with several setae. Mosses and freshwaters. |
Phyllognathopodidae a) |
|
|
Segment bearing the P.1 not fused to the cph.; Exp. A.2 of 2 segments; Mxp. not lamelliform. Freshwaters. |
Chappuisiidae a) |
|
|
Segment bearing the P.1 only partially fused with the cph.; Exp. A.2 absent or represented by 1-2 setae only; Mxp. degenerate; Fresh and salt waters. |
|
|
|
Segment bearing the P.1 completely fused with the cph. |
7 |
|
7. |
Mx2 as Figs. 13-15; body fusiform or vermiform; Benp. P.5 with only 2 setae (Benp. and Exp. of P.5 may be fused together but the parts are always recognizable) (Fig. 36). |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
8 |
|
8. |
P.1 as Fig. 24. |
|
|
|
P.1 as Fig. 25. |
Clytemnestridae a) |
|
|
P.1 as Fig. 26 (Enp. may be 2 or 3 segments). |
|
|
|
P.1 as Fig. 27. |
|
|
|
P.1 as Fig. 28 (Exp. can be 1 to 3 segments; 2nd Enp. segment may bear 1 claw or two long setae); Exp. A.2 present at least as a rudiment. |
|
|
|
P.1 as Fig. 29; Body pyriform; mouth-organs degenerate. |
|
|
|
Exp. P.1 absent or of 1 small segment; Enp. of 2 segments (Figs. 30-31). |
|
|
|
P.1 not as any of the above, or, if similar to Fig. 28 then Exp. A.2 absent. |
9 |
|
9. |
Exp. P.1 of 3 segments, middle segment without a spine on the outer border. |
10 |
|
|
Exp. P .1 of 3 segments, middle segment with a spine on outer border or Exp. P.1 of less than 3 segments. |
12 |
|
10. |
Enp. P.2-P.4 of 1 segment; Exp. P.3 (M) modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta. |
Parastenocarididae a) (freshwater) |
|
|
Enp. P.2-P.4 of 1:1:2 segments respectively; Exp. P.3 (M) not modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.2-P.4 of 2:1:2 segments respectively; Exp. P.3 (M) not modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.2-P.4 each of 2 segments; Exp. P.3 (M) not modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 with or without an inner seta. |
11 |
|
11. |
2nd segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta. |
|
|
|
2nd segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta. |
|
|
12. |
1st segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta; Mxp. not prehensile. |
13 |
|
|
These characters not combined. |
14 |
|
13. |
Exp. A.2 of 1 segment, with at most 2 setae. |
Aegisthidae a) |
|
|
Exp. A.2 of 3-4 segments with several setae. |
|
|
14. |
Enp. P.4 at most 2 segments. |
15 |
|
|
Enp. P.4 of 3 segments. |
31 |
|
15. |
Exp. A.2 of 4 segments; Mxp. not prehensile; Enp. P.1-P.4 with 3:2:2:2 segments respectively. |
Neobradyidae a) |
|
|
Exp. A.2 of 3 segments. |
16 |
|
|
Exp. A.2 at most 2 segments. |
17 |
|
16. |
Mxp. not prehensile; Enp. P.1-P.4 with 2:3:2:2 segments respectively. |
|
|
|
Mxp. prehensile; Enp. P.1-P.4 each of 2 segments. |
|
|
17. |
Mxp. not prehensile; A.1 (F) of 5-6 segments with plumose setae, all segments serrated dorsally. |
|
|
|
Mxp. not prehensile; remainder of above characters not combined. |
18 |
|
|
Mxp. prehensile. |
20 |
|
18. |
P.4 as Fig. 33 (Enp. may be 1 or 2 segments); P.5 a single small plate; A.1 (F) of not more than 7 segments. |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
19 |
|
19. |
Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 with 3 spines on the outer border. |
Louriniidae a) |
|
|
Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 with at most 2 setae and/or spines on the outer border. |
|
|
20. |
Mxp. as Fig. 20. |
|
|
|
Mxp. not as above. |
21 |
|
21. |
Exp. P.4 as Fig. 33 (Enp. may be 1 or 2 segments); P.5 a single plate. |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
22 |
|
22. |
Mxp. as Fig. 19. |
|
|
|
Mxp. not as above. |
23 |
|
23. |
Labrum large and strongly prominent; Rostrum articulated with cph.; Cu.f. always distinctive in shape. |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
24 |
|
24. |
Exp. A.2 absent; A.1 (F) at most 5 segments. |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
25 |
|
25. |
All body segments sharply differentiated; Enp. P.1 not prehensile, at most of 2 segments. |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
26 |
|
26. |
A.1 (F) of 4-5 segments; Enp. P.1 not prehensile. |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
27 |
|
27. |
P.1 as Fig. 32. |
|
|
|
P.1 not as above; basis of P.2-P.4 transversely prolongated. |
|
|
|
P.1-P.4 not as either of above. |
28 |
|
28. |
A.2 with basis (Fig. 8). |
|
|
|
A.2 with allobasis (Fig. 9). |
29 |
|
29. |
Rostrum large; P.5 as Figs. 37-38. |
|
|
|
Rostrum large; P.5 not as above; A.1 (F) of 4 segments; Exp. A.2 of 1 segment. |
|
|
|
Not as either above. |
30 |
|
30. |
Enp. P.1 prehensile; Enp. P.2-P.3 of 3 segments. |
|
|
|
These characters not combined. |
|
|
31. |
Cuticular lenses present. |
Miraciidae a) |
|
|
No cuticular lenses. |
32 |
|
32. |
Body shape as Fig. 7. |
Miraciidae a) |
|
|
Body shape not as above. |
33 |
|
33. |
A.2 with basis (Fig. 8); Exp. A.2 of 1 segment; Mx2 with at most 3 endites. |
34 |
|
|
These characters not combined. |
38 |
|
34. |
P.5 with Benp. and Exp. distinct. |
35 |
|
|
P.5 with Benp. and Exp. fused to form a single plate. |
37 |
|
35. |
Enp. P.1 of 2 segments, not prehensile. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.1 of 3 segments. |
36 |
|
36. |
1st segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta. |
|
|
|
1st segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta. |
|
|
37. |
Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 each with at least 5 setae and/or spines. |
|
|
|
Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 each with only 4 setae and/or spines. |
Latiremidae a) |
|
|
Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 with 4:5:5 setae and/or spines respectively. |
|
|
38. |
Mxp. well developed, not prehensile. |
|
|
|
Mxp. not as above. |
39 |
|
39. |
Enp. P.1 not prehensile. |
40 |
|
|
Enp. P.1 prehensile. |
43 |
|
40. |
Exp. A.2 very small, of 1 segment with 2 setae at most. |
41 |
|
|
Exp. A.2 well developed, of 2-4 segments with more than 2 setae. |
42a |
|
41. |
Enp. P.1 of 3 segments. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.1 of 2 segments. |
|
|
42a |
Enp. P.1 of 2 segments. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.1 of 3 segments |
42b |
|
42b |
Enp. P.1 of 3 short segments; 1st segment shorter than the 2nd and 3rd, which are approximately equal in length; P.5 either a single plate or with the inner expansion of the Benp. well developed. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.1 of 3 segments; 1st and 2nd segments elongate, the 3rd very short; Inner expansion of Benp. reduced (Fig. 39). |
|
|
43. |
Enp. of Mxp. of at least 2 segments (Fig. 18) . |
44 |
|
|
Enp. of Mxp. of 1 segment only, the more distal segments not distinguishable from the terminal claw (Fig. 17). |
45 |
|
44. |
Inner expansion of Benp. P.5 well developed, with several setae. |
|
|
|
Inner expansion of Benp. P.5 not well developed, without setae. |
|
|
45. |
Exp. P.1 with 1 or 2 segments only. |
|
|
|
Exp. P.1 with 3 segments. |
46 |
|
46. |
At least one of the Enp. of P.2-P.4 of less than 3 segments. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.2-P.4 of 3 segments. |
47 |
|
47. |
Distal segment of Enp. P.2-P.4: |
|
|
|
each with 5 setae and/or spines. |
48 |
|
|
each with 4 setae and/or spines. |
49 |
|
|
each with 3 setae and/or spines. |
50 |
|
|
with 5:6:5 setae and/or spines respectively. |
51 |
|
|
with 4:4-5:4-5 setae and/or spines respectively. |
52 |
|
|
with 4:6:5 setae and/or spines respectively. |
53 |
|
|
with a setation different from any of the above. |
|
|
48. |
Enp. P.1 of 3 segments, the 1st only slightly longer than the last two together. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.1 of 2 or 3 segments, the 1st very much longer than the remainder. |
|
|
49. |
Enp. P.1 of 3 segments. |
|
|
|
Enp. P.1 of 2 segments. |
|
|
50. |
Exp. A.2 of 3 segments; P.5 a single plate; Enp. P.1 not prehensile. |
|
|
|
Exp. A.2 of 2 segments; Benp. And Exp. P.5 distinct; Enp. P.1 prehensile. |
|
|
51. |
A.2 with allobasis (Fig. 9) or if with a basis then the 2nd segment of Enp. P.2-P.3 has two inner setae. |
|
|
|
A.2 with basis (Fig. 8); 2nd segment of Enp. P.2-P.3 with 1 inner seta at most. |
|
|
52. |
2nd segment of Exp. P.1 elongate, much longer than either the 1st or the 3rd segment. |
Parastenheliidae a) |
|
|
All segments of Exp. P.1 of approximately equal length. |
|
|
53. |
2nd segment of Exp. P.1 elongate, much longer than either the 1st or the 3rd segments; Exp. P.5 (F) a large foliaceous plate. |
|
|
|
All segments of Exp. P.1 of approximately equal length. |
a) The following notes are relevant to
these families.
1. Phyllognathopodidae and Chappuisiidae
Species of these families have never been found in marine or brackish waters. The Chappuisiidae contains only the genus Chappuisius; its two species are described in Lang (1948). The Phyllognathopodidae contains two genera: Phyllognathopus, which is described in Lang (1948), although several new species have been discovered subsequently, and Allophyllognathopus Kiefer, 1967, with a single species.
2. Parastenocarididae
An almost exclusively freshwater family with three genera. Parastenocaris
is a large genus whose diagnosis is given by Lang (1948) along with
descriptions of many species, although very many more have been discovered
subsequently. Forficatocaris Jakobi, 1969 and Paraforficatocaris
Jakobi, 1972 are the other genera.
Two species of Parastenocaris, P. phyllura and P.
vicessima, have been recorded from brackish waters; descriptions are given
by Lang (1948).
3. Aegisthidae, Clytemnestridae
(by Boxshall, 1979) and Miraciidae
These families are found exclusively in the marine plankton. A key is given by Wells (1970).
4. Balaenophilidae
Contains the single species Balaenophilus
unisetus which has been recoded only as a commensal on baleen whales.
5. Neobradyidae
Contains the single species Neobradya pectinifera.
6. Louriniidae
Contains two species only, Lourinia armata and L. nicobarica, which probably are synonymous.
7. Parastenheliidae
Contains the single genus Parastenhelia.
8. Porcellidiidae
Contains the single genus Porcellidium, of which the following
species are not included in the catalogues of Lang and Bodin:
P. unicus Ummerkutty,
1970,
P. dilatatum Hicks,
1971,
P. erythrum Hicks,
1971,
P. planum Tiemann,
1977,
P. paniculiferum
Tiemann, 1978,
P. hartmannorum
Tiemann, 1978,
P. tapui Hicks &
Webbe, 1983,
P. tristanense is
redescribed by Hicks (1982a),
P. algoense Hicks,
1982a,
P. laurencium Hicks,
1982a,
P. ulvum Hicks, 1982a,
P. brevicaudatum
redescribed by Humes & Ho (1969b)
9. Longipediidae (see Wells,
1981; Itô, 1981)
Contains the single genus Longipedia, about which the following
information is relevant.
L. minor helgolandica Klie,
1949 is raised to species rank by Gonzalez & Bowman (1965).
L. pontica n.sp. of Apostolov (1969) is not L. pontica Kricagin, which Apostolov (1973a) considers a synonym of L. minor.
10. Latiremidae
The affinities of the family are obscure. It was erected by Bozic (1969) to accommodate a new genus and species, Latiremus eximus, but it would seem that the problematical genus Delamarella Chappuis, 1954a is closely related; Bozic does not discuss this possibility. Chappuis could not decide on the correct family for his genus and placed it as incertae sedis in the Order. No further discussion of the affinities of Delamarella has appeared in the literature to date. The most peculiar feature of Latiremus is the modified P.4 Exp. of the male, which characteristic is also shown in an almost identical manner in Delamarella and this genus is so very similar also in the P.1, P.5, caudal furca, mandible palp, setation of P.1-P.4 that there can be little doubt of their relationship. They may even be congeneric but until a thorough examination is possible it is best to consider them distinct. The species of the family are:
Latiremus eximius
Bozic, 1969,
Delamarella arenicola
Chappuis, 1954a,
D. karamani Petkovski,
1957,
D. galateae Cottarelli, 1971b.