KEY TO THE FAMILIES OF HARPACTICOIDA

(amended from Lang, 1948)

 

1.

Commensal on whales.

Balaenophilidae a)

 

Not commensal on whales.

2

2.

Body laterally compressed, as Fig. 4.

Tegastidae

 

Body dorso-ventrally compressed, with the expanded epimera of the anterior abdominal segments enfolding the posterior abdomen and caudal furca, giving the body the shape of a wood-louse. (Figs. 5-6).

3

 

Body of a different shape from either of above conditions.

4

3.

Body-shape as Fig. 5; without clearly seen chitin “skeleton”; P.1 as Fig. 22.

Porcellidiidae a)

 

Body-shape as Fig. 6; a chitinous “skeleton” clearly visible; P .1 as Fig. 23.

Peltidiidae

4.

Exp. A.2 of at least 6 segments.

5

 

Exp. A.2 of not more than 4 segments.

6

5.

Distal segment of Enp. P.2 much longer than the entire Exp.

Longipediidae a)

 

Distal segment of Enp. P.2 shorter than the Exp.

Canuellidae

6.

Segment bearing the P.1 not fused to the cph.; Exp. A.2 of 1 segment with several setae; Mxp. lamelliform with several setae. Mosses and freshwaters.

Phyllognathopodidae a)

 

Segment bearing the P.1 not fused to the cph.; Exp. A.2 of 2 segments; Mxp. not lamelliform. Freshwaters.

Chappuisiidae a)

 

Segment bearing the P.1 only partially fused with the cph.; Exp. A.2 absent or represented by 1-2 setae only; Mxp. degenerate; Fresh and salt waters.

Darcythompsoniidae

 

Segment bearing the P.1 completely fused with the cph.

7

7.

Mx2 as Figs. 13-15; body fusiform or vermiform; Benp. P.5 with only 2 setae (Benp. and Exp. of P.5 may be fused together but the parts are always recognizable) (Fig. 36).

Ectinosomatidae

 

These characters not combined.

8

8.

P.1 as Fig. 24.

Harpacticidae

 

P.1 as Fig. 25.

Clytemnestridae a)

 

P.1 as Fig. 26 (Enp. may be 2 or 3 segments).

Tisbidae

 

P.1 as Fig. 27.

Tachidiidae

 

P.1 as Fig. 28 (Exp. can be 1 to 3 segments; 2nd Enp. segment may bear 1 claw or two long setae); Exp. A.2 present at least as a rudiment.

Laophontidae

 

P.1 as Fig. 29; Body pyriform; mouth-organs degenerate.

Metidae

 

Exp. P.1 absent or of 1 small segment; Enp. of 2 segments (Figs. 30-31).

Cylindropsyllidae

 

P.1 not as any of the above, or, if similar to Fig. 28 then Exp. A.2 absent.

9

9.

Exp. P.1 of 3 segments, middle segment without a spine on the outer border.

10

 

Exp. P .1 of 3 segments, middle segment with a spine on outer border or Exp. P.1 of less than 3 segments.

12

10.

Enp. P.2-P.4 of 1 segment; Exp. P.3 (M) modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta.

Parastenocarididae a)

(freshwater)

 

Enp. P.2-P.4 of 1:1:2 segments respectively; Exp. P.3 (M) not modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta.

Cylindropsyllidae

 

Enp. P.2-P.4 of 2:1:2 segments respectively; Exp. P.3 (M) not modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta.

Cylindropsyllidae

 

Enp. P.2-P.4 each of 2 segments; Exp. P.3 (M) not modified; 2nd segment Exp. P.1 with or without an inner seta.

11

11.

2nd segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta.

Ameiridae

 

2nd segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta.

Cylindropsyllidae

12.

1st segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta; Mxp. not prehensile.

13

 

These characters not combined.

14

13.

Exp. A.2 of 1 segment, with at most 2 setae.

Aegisthidae a)

 

Exp. A.2 of 3-4 segments with several setae.

Cerviniidae

14.

Enp. P.4 at most 2 segments.

15

 

Enp. P.4 of 3 segments.

31

15.

Exp. A.2 of 4 segments; Mxp. not prehensile; Enp. P.1-P.4 with 3:2:2:2 segments respectively.

Neobradyidae a)

 

Exp. A.2 of 3 segments.

16

 

Exp. A.2 at most 2 segments.

17

16.

Mxp. not prehensile; Enp. P.1-P.4 with 2:3:2:2 segments respectively.

Tisbidae

 

Mxp. prehensile; Enp. P.1-P.4 each of 2 segments.

Diosaccidae

17.

Mxp. not prehensile; A.1 (F) of 5-6 segments with plumose setae, all segments serrated dorsally.

Tisbidae

 

Mxp. not prehensile; remainder of above characters not combined.

18

 

Mxp. prehensile.

20

18.

P.4 as Fig. 33 (Enp. may be 1 or 2 segments); P.5 a single small plate; A.1 (F) of not more than 7 segments.

Cylindropsyllidae

 

These characters not combined.

19

19.

Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 with 3 spines on the outer border.

Louriniidae a)

 

Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 with at most 2 setae and/or spines on the outer border.

Darcythompsoniidae

20.

Mxp. as Fig. 20.

Cylindropsyllidae

 

Mxp. not as above.

21

21.

Exp. P.4 as Fig. 33 (Enp. may be 1 or 2 segments); P.5 a single plate.

Cylindropsyllidae

 

These characters not combined.

22

22.

Mxp. as Fig. 19.

Paramesochridae

 

Mxp. not as above.

23

23.

Labrum large and strongly prominent; Rostrum articulated with cph.; Cu.f. always distinctive in shape.

Tetragonicipitidae

 

These characters not combined.

24

24.

Exp. A.2 absent; A.1 (F) at most 5 segments.

Ancorabolidae

 

These characters not combined.

25

25.

All body segments sharply differentiated; Enp. P.1 not prehensile, at most of 2 segments.

Cletodidae

 

These characters not combined.

26

26.

A.1 (F) of 4-5 segments; Enp. P.1 not prehensile.

Cletodidae

 

These characters not combined.

27

27.

P.1 as Fig. 32.

Ameiridae

 

P.1 not as above; basis of P.2-P.4 transversely prolongated.

Ameiridae

 

P.1-P.4 not as either of above.

28

28.

A.2 with basis (Fig. 8).

Ameiridae

 

A.2 with allobasis (Fig. 9).

29

29.

Rostrum large; P.5 as Figs. 37-38.

Diosaccidae

 

Rostrum large; P.5 not as above; A.1 (F) of 4 segments; Exp. A.2 of 1 segment.

Canthocamptidae

 

Not as either above.

30

30.

Enp. P.1 prehensile; Enp. P.2-P.3 of 3 segments.

Diosaccidae

 

These characters not combined.

Canthocamptidae

31.

Cuticular lenses present.

Miraciidae a)

 

No cuticular lenses.

32

32.

Body shape as Fig. 7.

Miraciidae a)

 

Body shape not as above.

33

33.

A.2 with basis (Fig. 8); Exp. A.2 of 1 segment; Mx2 with at most 3 endites.

34

 

These characters not combined.

38

34.

P.5 with Benp. and Exp. distinct.

35

 

P.5 with Benp. and Exp. fused to form a single plate.

37

35.

Enp. P.1 of 2 segments, not prehensile.

Cletodidae

 

Enp. P.1 of 3 segments.

36

36.

1st segment Exp. P.1 with an inner seta.

Cletodidae

 

1st segment Exp. P.1 without an inner seta.

Ameiridae

37.

Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 each with at least 5 setae and/or spines.

Ameiridae

 

Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 each with only 4 setae and/or spines.

Latiremidae a)

 

Distal segment Exp. P.2-P.4 with 4:5:5 setae and/or spines respectively.

Cletodidae

38.

Mxp. well developed, not prehensile.

Tisbidae

 

Mxp. not as above.

39

39.

Enp. P.1 not prehensile.

40

 

Enp. P.1 prehensile.

43

40.

Exp. A.2 very small, of 1 segment with 2 setae at most.

41

 

Exp. A.2 well developed, of 2-4 segments with more than 2 setae.

42a

41.

Enp. P.1 of 3 segments.

Cletodidae

 

Enp. P.1 of 2 segments.

Diosaccidae

42a

Enp. P.1 of 2 segments.

Tachidiidae

 

Enp. P.1 of 3 segments

42b

42b

Enp. P.1 of 3 short segments; 1st segment shorter than the 2nd and 3rd, which are approximately equal in length; P.5 either a single plate or with the inner expansion of the Benp. well developed.

Tachidiidae

 

Enp. P.1 of 3 segments; 1st and 2nd segments elongate, the 3rd very short; Inner expansion of Benp. reduced (Fig. 39).

Tisbidae

43.

Enp. of Mxp. of at least 2 segments (Fig. 18) .

44

 

Enp. of Mxp. of 1 segment only, the more distal segments not distinguishable from the terminal claw (Fig. 17).

45

44.

Inner expansion of Benp. P.5 well developed, with several setae.

Diosaccidae

 

Inner expansion of Benp. P.5 not well developed, without setae.

Tisbidae

45.

Exp. P.1 with 1 or 2 segments only.

Thalestridae

 

Exp. P.1 with 3 segments.

46

46.

At least one of the Enp. of P.2-P.4 of less than 3 segments.

Thalestridae

 

Enp. P.2-P.4 of 3 segments.

47

47.

Distal segment of Enp. P.2-P.4:

 

 

each with 5 setae and/or spines.

48

 

each with 4 setae and/or spines.

49

 

each with 3 setae and/or spines.

50

 

with 5:6:5 setae and/or spines respectively.

51

 

with 4:4-5:4-5 setae and/or spines respectively.

52

 

with 4:6:5 setae and/or spines respectively.

53

 

with a setation different from any of the above.

Ameiridae

48.

Enp. P.1 of 3 segments, the 1st only slightly longer than the last two together.

Ameiridae

 

Enp. P.1 of 2 or 3 segments, the 1st very much longer than the remainder.

Thalestridae

49.

Enp. P.1 of 3 segments.

Ameiridae

 

Enp. P.1 of 2 segments.

Thalestridae

50.

Exp. A.2 of 3 segments; P.5 a single plate; Enp. P.1 not prehensile.

Thalestridae

 

Exp. A.2 of 2 segments; Benp. And Exp. P.5 distinct; Enp. P.1 prehensile.

Ameiridae

51.

A.2 with allobasis (Fig. 9) or if with a basis then the 2nd segment of Enp. P.2-P.3 has two inner setae.

Thalestridae

 

A.2 with basis (Fig. 8); 2nd segment of Enp. P.2-P.3 with 1 inner seta at most.

Ameiridae

52.

2nd segment of Exp. P.1 elongate, much longer than either the 1st or the 3rd segment.

Parastenheliidae a)

 

All segments of Exp. P.1 of approximately equal length.

Ameiridae

53.

2nd segment of Exp. P.1 elongate, much longer than either the 1st or the 3rd segments; Exp. P.5 (F) a large foliaceous plate.

Thalestridae

 

All segments of Exp. P.1 of approximately equal length.

Ameiridae

 

 

a)             The following notes are relevant to these families.

 

1.              Phyllognathopodidae and Chappuisiidae

Species of these families have never been found in marine or brackish waters. The Chappuisiidae contains only the genus Chappuisius; its two species are described in Lang (1948). The Phyllognathopodidae contains two genera: Phyllognathopus, which is described in Lang (1948), although several new species have been discovered subsequently, and Allophyllognathopus Kiefer, 1967, with a single species.

 

2.              Parastenocarididae

An almost exclusively freshwater family with three genera. Parastenocaris is a large genus whose diagnosis is given by Lang (1948) along with descriptions of many species, although very many more have been discovered subsequently. Forficatocaris Jakobi, 1969 and Paraforficatocaris Jakobi, 1972 are the other genera.

Two species of Parastenocaris, P. phyllura and P. vicessima, have been recorded from brackish waters; descriptions are given by Lang (1948).

 

3.              Aegisthidae, Clytemnestridae (by Boxshall, 1979) and Miraciidae

These families are found exclusively in the marine plankton. A key is given by Wells (1970).

 

4.              Balaenophilidae

Contains the single species Balaenophilus unisetus which has been recoded only as a commensal on baleen whales.

 

5.              Neobradyidae

Contains the single species Neobradya pectinifera.

 

6.              Louriniidae

Contains two species only, Lourinia armata and L. nicobarica, which probably are synonymous.

 

7.              Parastenheliidae

Contains the single genus Parastenhelia.

 

8.              Porcellidiidae

Contains the single genus Porcellidium, of which the following species are not included in the catalogues of Lang and Bodin:

P. unicus Ummerkutty, 1970,

P. dilatatum Hicks, 1971,

P. erythrum Hicks, 1971,

P. planum Tiemann, 1977,

P. paniculiferum Tiemann, 1978,

P. hartmannorum Tiemann, 1978,

P. tapui Hicks & Webbe, 1983,

P. tristanense is redescribed by Hicks (1982a),

P. algoense Hicks, 1982a,

P. laurencium Hicks, 1982a,

P. ulvum Hicks, 1982a,

P. brevicaudatum redescribed by Humes & Ho (1969b)

 

9.              Longipediidae (see Wells, 1981; Itô, 1981)

Contains the single genus Longipedia, about which the following information is relevant.

L. minor helgolandica Klie, 1949 is raised to species rank by Gonzalez & Bowman (1965).

L. pontica n.sp. of Apostolov (1969) is not L. pontica Kricagin, which Apostolov (1973a) considers a synonym of L. minor.

 

10.           Latiremidae

The affinities of the family are obscure. It was erected by Bozic (1969) to accommodate a new genus and species, Latiremus eximus, but it would seem that the problematical genus Delamarella Chappuis, 1954a is closely related; Bozic does not discuss this possibility. Chappuis could not decide on the correct family for his genus and placed it as incertae sedis in the Order. No further discussion of the affinities of Delamarella has appeared in the literature to date. The most peculiar feature of Latiremus is the modified P.4 Exp. of the male, which characteristic is also shown in an almost identical manner in Delamarella and this genus is so very similar also in the P.1, P.5, caudal furca, mandible palp, setation of P.1-P.4 that there can be little doubt of their relationship. They may even be congeneric but until a thorough examination is possible it is best to consider them distinct. The species of the family are:

Latiremus eximius Bozic, 1969,

Delamarella arenicola Chappuis, 1954a,

D. karamani Petkovski, 1957,

D. galateae Cottarelli, 1971b.